Manuscript Reviewer
About this tool⌄
Upload a manuscript for a structured review across six dimensions: internal consistency, reference integrity verified against Crossref and OpenAlex, statistical reporting, scientific quality against CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA guidelines, a novelty check against the published literature, and a language/copyediting pass. Every finding quotes the exact text and includes a concrete suggested fix, not just a diagnosis. Two independent AI reviewers weigh in before a meta-review synthesizes the result. Upload a revised version later and the service tracks which issues were resolved.
How it works
- Upload your manuscript (PDF or Word)
- Internal Consistency and Statistical Review check your own numbers and claims against each other — even recomputing statistics to verify reported results
- Reference Integrity verifies every citation against real Crossref/OpenAlex records
- Scientific Quality and Novelty each get two independent AI reviewers whose opinions are reconciled into one synthesized finding — closer to real peer review than a single pass
- Language & Copyediting catches grammar, clarity, and phrasing issues with ready-to-use corrections
- Revise your manuscript and upload the new version under the same project — the service tells you exactly which prior issues were resolved, partially resolved, or still open
Who it's for: Authors preparing a manuscript for journal or conference submission who want a real critical read — not a spell-checker — before they submit, plus a way to track whether their revisions actually fixed the flagged issues.