Manuscript Reviewer

Upload a manuscript for a structured review across six dimensions: internal consistency, reference integrity verified against Crossref and OpenAlex, statistical reporting, scientific quality against CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA guidelines, a novelty check against the published literature, and a language/copyediting pass. Every finding quotes the exact text and includes a concrete suggested fix, not just a diagnosis. Two independent AI reviewers weigh in before a meta-review synthesizes the result. Upload a revised version later and the service tracks which issues were resolved.

How it works

1. Upload your manuscript (PDF or Word)
2. Internal Consistency and Statistical Review check your own numbers and claims against each other — even recomputing statistics to verify reported results
3. Reference Integrity verifies every citation against real Crossref/OpenAlex records
4. Scientific Quality and Novelty each get two independent AI reviewers whose opinions are reconciled into one synthesized finding — closer to real peer review than a single pass
5. Language & Copyediting catches grammar, clarity, and phrasing issues with ready-to-use corrections
6. Revise your manuscript and upload the new version under the same project — the service tells you exactly which prior issues were resolved, partially resolved, or still open

Who it's for: Authors preparing a manuscript for journal or conference submission who want a real critical read — not a spell-checker — before they submit, plus a way to track whether their revisions actually fixed the flagged issues.